Sunday, August 30, 2009
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Now, I'm pretty sensitive about certain racial issues but I am not in this case. In fact, I see pretty much nothing wrong with what Microsoft did. This is advertisement. It needs to appeal to the demographic you are after. I know nothing about Poland but I am assuming that the demographic is nothing like it is in the U.S. and that there are not many people who are black. To appeal to that demographic, Microsoft probably felt it need to make the people look more "Polish".
While I would like to think everybody would be enlightened and not take race into consideration, I know better. My company puts up several webpage. We have one page in particular depicting a family. This family looks very "American". It depicts a white couple with a cute young daughter in front of a big suburban house. This page works great for our site, but it only works great in the United States. In ever other country, it does much worse. The page is rather simple, and it changes language depending on the country. The only reason it would only work in the United States and not in other countries is because the family just looks American.
So I see no problem in Microsoft changing the picture to better match the target audience and have no idea why anybody would make a big deal about it. What do you think?
Monday, August 24, 2009
Tonight I went jogging. When I go running, I like to listen to music. Being too cheap to buy another mp3 player (my fiancee uses the one I have), I use the mp3 playing functionality of my phone. It runs Windows Mobile on it and thus has a Windows Media Player. The phone has a micro-sd slot in it, so I can load the card up with music and play it on the phone. Since my phone is bluetooth capable, it has the added benefit that I can match it up with bluetooth headphones and not have to deal with any wires.
So when I started on my run today, much to my dismay, there was no sound. I struggled for several minutes trying to figure it out. I adjusted the volume on the headset itself. No good. I turned up the volume on Windows Media Player. No luck. I searched in all the options and menus to see if there was some mute setting. No go. Then my mom called. And the phone had sound. The phone rang and I could hear my mom's voice through the phone. WTF? I tried running the music without the headphones, it normally will play through my phone's built in speaker. Still nothing. Now I was confused. I tried one more thing. My fiancee's ringtone is a song. I knew the song wouldn't play on Windows Media, but what if she called me? Would it play the ringtone like it was all the standard rings? Sure enough it did!
So seriously, what the hell was going on. It seemed that my Windows Mobile device had all the sounds working except for Windows Media Player. I could take calls and hear the phone ring but that was it.
It turns out there is one more volume control (making a total of three) that I had to adjust. The headset itself has a volume control and it was turned way down. This is the main volume control for the entire phone. It is so important, it has its own stupid control on the side of the phone. I can not explain how absolutely stupid I felt when I figured this out.
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Market went down today by over 2%. While this is not the first big pull back for the market since this insane run up, it is starting to feel like we have hit a top in the market and we now are going to test some technical levels below.
I have slowly gotten out of some of my short positions but stayed in them for the most part waiting for this turn. I got a little bit more short today, but overall I still lost a lot of money as I’m a little heavy weight in some commodity names and in China, two things that did not do well at all. I wanted to get a little bit more short in a few sectors but ran into a small snag when Etrade would not let me short some ETFs. Seems as if it is difficult to borrow some of these, probably because there are still lots of people short this market.
I checked the levels on all my accounts and much to my surprise, I have a lot more cash on the sidelines than I realized. Most of this is due to the fact that I’ve not been doing very much buying in the last few months and I’ve been earning money in my day job in the meantime. I’m looking to buy something if the correction I predict actually happens but to be perfectly honest, I’m really not attracted to anything unless we get a very serious correction, a correction back down to the March lows. I just can not get very bullish about where we are as a country. Yes, we may have averted disaster in the short term. But does anyone really think that all that borrowing our government did is actually going to turn out well? How did that work out for all those people who took out those home equity loans?
Thursday, August 13, 2009
The one bright spot came today when I went to talk to him to try and convince him to stay. Knowing why he is leaving, I had little hope of trying to get him to stay but I had to at least give it a try. As I started to go into my little spiel he told me to stop because there was little chance I was going to convince him to stay. He told me that the one chance I had was if I told him that I was going to leave the company in a few months and that I would take him wherever I went. He really enjoyed working for me and that it was hard to find a boss that he could respect. He just did not want to work at my company any more.
It is an honor to work with smart people. It is an even bigger honor when these smart people basically tell you that you are a great boss. Makes me that much sadder that he is leaving.
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
But as this market tries to find its equilibrium point, it got me thinking. Are we just going to keep cycling through bubbles? And if so, how badly is it going to end? If we do indeed keep putting off our problems, like all financial mistakes it will just be that much worse when the bill comes due.
Right now, the market has rallied about 50% from its lows. This run-up is in a matter of months. Does that actually sound normal to anybody? The market has gone up this much because the government is pumping out cash like there is no tomorrow. This has already had some effect that should cause people's eyebrows to rise. The rally has been very broad based. And I emphasize the broad part. Some of the worse stocks are doing OK. Stocks of companies that should not exist have actually gone up with the rest of the market. When junk is doing well, you know you have a bubble on your hands.
Just look at the other bubbles that we have had in the last decade. The valuation of some of the dot coms were just ridiculous. Billions in "value" for companies with no revenue. The housing bubble was probably worse. Run down shacks were selling for small fortunes in parts of the country.
Bubbles take longer to form than just a few months, but maybe this one actually has formed faster because we have had the others one that preceded this one. Maybe we aren't even in a bubble and I'm making too much of this. But I just don't see how we can have possibly gone up this much this fast. The future does not look bright from here. Granted, expectations were so low as to be ridiculous before but anyone who thinks that we are going to just bounce off the bottom is just not looking around. There really is not much of an economic recovery happening. People are still losing jobs and companies are still pulling back. Is this really news to get excited over?
Monday, August 10, 2009
I often use this bit of advice to try and figure out what stocks I want to buy. But today I got just the opposite. I decided not to buy a stock because of my own experience. I had been considering for some time whether or not I wanted to buy Yum Brands. This is the company that holds such companies like KFC and Taco Bell. I'm not a huge fan of these restaurants but I like the space and I like the exposure that Yum Brands has in China.
I do not personally go to any of its restaurants too often but every once in a while I get a craving for a Chalupa. So I went to Taco Bell today, the second time I have gone in the last six months. But for the second time in as many visits, my service was horrible. I had to wait almost 15 minutes from when I ordered my food to when I got it. How is this "fast food". It isn't even slow food. It is food moving at glacial speeds.
Could these be just isolated incidents? Maybe. But it has convinced me not to go back to a Taco Bell and it convinced me not to touch the stock.
Thursday, August 6, 2009
I find this pretty hard to believe. I'm a pretty avid internet user and the thought of paying for content really just does not sit with me. For example. I often visit ESPN and the Wall Street Journal. Both these sites have sections for paid content. Despite the fact that I often go there and I sometimes want to see the stories they have for paid subscribers, I honestly do not feel that compelled to pay for their sites. Why? Because there is so much other content available elsewhere that is often just as good.
In this day and age all I have to do is search on Google and I most likely will find another similar story for free. At worse, I probably will find a blog somewhere that talks about the content of the story. As I tend to be a skimmer of news anyway, that is all I want, so it works out for me.
We have a whole generation of people who cannot even imagine paying for content any more. I am not saying that all content should be free. Far from it. I actually think it might have been better if content was never free. But the genie was let out of the bottle a long time ago and it is going to be pretty hard to put back in.
Somehow Murdoch thinks if he does this, and can make money, it will force all media outlets to do the same, thus eliminating the problem of free content. Yeah, fat chance of that happening. I can pretty much promise you that if this even came close to reality, and it will not, there would be someone who finds a way to get users this content for free. Look at what happens every time the music industry tries to shut down a sharing technology. Another one takes its place.
Does anyone here actually pay for news content?
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
I still have smaller positions in this trade, but it is past the point where I think I can reasonably make more money than I already lost. Had to do it. There comes a point where you have to admit you were wrong and just move on. I don't think the market takes off from here, but I'm also not so sure we can come back down to retest the lows. If you have shorts on at this point, just get out of the way of this market. I know with my luck, this will exactly mark the turn, but I just could not continue to fight the market.
Monday, August 3, 2009
In short, no. I think the analysis that states that this marks the bottom of the recession is a little short sighted. The problem with any program like this is that its long term effects are hard to measure and almost impossible to see. While I have no doubt that the program had beneficial effects for the auto industry this month, its longer term effect is not so clear. One problem that a government provided subsidy like this poses is the same problem we have had for the last decade or so. What happens to auto sales six months from now when the money has run out? Will demand still be there for automobiles or will yet another government stimulus be needed? Are we just pushing sales to the near months and the expense of the far months? How many of these sales would have happened without the stimulus? Compounding the problem, we will all pay for this with interest.
What most people do not realize is that this is a simple transfer of wealth from all of us to those who are buying cars now. Government subsidies must eventually be paid for and that money comes from the income tax that we all pay. I know for many people, this seems like a good thing. I mean, it is free money right? Sadly, no. We all pay. Does that mean I think the program is a bad thing? Well the jury is out. Being pro-environment, I'm at least glad some of the cars being traded in are being taken off the road. But as an economic stimulus? Sadly, I think it will fail.
Sunday, August 2, 2009
But right now, the market is just too good. Everything is going up and it is a bad time to be short anything. While my portfolio is up over the last several weeks, it would be even stronger if I wasn't short here and short against the Dow Jones. This does not really bother me since when the market looked weaker, I probably would not have gotten into some of my better positions if I did not short something against them. So net, I have made more money than I have lost.
Is it time to take profits on that position. If they were short term plays, absolutely. The market rally is now right around the level where greed and fear is taking over. There is no more reason to bid this market up yet it keeps going up. Yes, the world is not falling apart. But if you think a recovery is right around the corner, just take a peek there. You will notice that the next street over looks pretty bare.