<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building Empires</title>
	<link>http://www.doublejourney.com/2008/04/22/building-empires/</link>
	<description>Going From Good To Great</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.doublejourney.com/2008/04/22/building-empires/#comment-7330</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.doublejourney.com/2008/04/22/building-empires/#comment-7330</guid>
		<description>The mentality goes back to the military.  How soldiers do you commend?  How many forts do you control?  

Up to a certain point I understand that managers feel like they're important if they have a good number of staff (they get more budget because the company feels their service is a necessity).   However after a certain number, if the team is not producing more then at that point, number of staff is not the answer. It's more likely inefficiencies in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mentality goes back to the military.  How soldiers do you commend?  How many forts do you control?  </p>
<p>Up to a certain point I understand that managers feel like they&#8217;re important if they have a good number of staff (they get more budget because the company feels their service is a necessity).   However after a certain number, if the team is not producing more then at that point, number of staff is not the answer. It&#8217;s more likely inefficiencies in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
